Armed Robbery or Government: Which is Better?

Legendary comedian Jack Benny, known to be a skinflint, was met one night by an armed thug.

“Your money or your life,” said the thug.

Benny was silent. The thug said, “Well, what’s it going to be?”

I’m thinking…I’m thinking!” was Benny’s reply.

Taxation is theft, ladies and gentlemen. If there is the slightest hint of compulsion in taxation, it’s theft. Your money is taken from you under the threat of either loss of freedom of loss of life.

Taxation in the USA is a protection racket. If you pay your taxes willingly and meekly, the government is likely to leave you alone for the remainder of that year. But refuse to be taxed and reject government protection and you will meet with a fate worse than meeting with an armed robber.

Paying taxes is akin to meeting an armed robber…but government is at your door, not in some dark alley. They work in similar ways, but I’m here to tell you that, given the choice between an armed robber and government, always choose the armed robber.

To offer proof, let’s look at some ways that an armed robbery is superior to government taxation.

An armed robbery might occur while you are in your car, your home, a city street or country lane. He might brandish some weapon and relieve you of your wallet, purse or other valuables. He might steal your car. He might even shoot you if you resist, even unto your death. But at least your encounter with an armed robber is customarily between individuals of a small number. Then, he usually goes on his way to seek out his next victim, or maybe to spend the spoils of his robbery.

The government does not act in such a manner. Government robs you in a far more despicable and cruel way. If you are an employee, government reaches into the coffers of your employer and collects the money it wants even before you receive it (can you imagine an armed robber showing up at the payroll office of your employer and demanding a portion of your wages?). If you are self employed, government wants their “cut” monthly. If you own property, you’ll either pay your tax or government will confiscate your property and sell it for the tax they think they are due.

The robber understands the crime he commits, its danger and the possible consequences of his own act. He doesn’t assert a position that he has some prior claim to your money, or that he is going to use your money to benefit you. He is simply an armed robber and nothing more. He hasn’t offered a protection plan in exchange for the money he stole from you against your will. Once the robber takes your money, he usually leaves you alone. He does not follow you wherever you go, proclaiming that he is your master because of the protection he provides to you with the money he stole from you. He does not require your obeisance, homage or loyalty into the future…only your money today. He does not consider you to be his slave or servant. He does not force you to do this thing, or prohibit you from doing that. The robber does not usually come back to you over and over for more money. And if you dispute his authority, the robber does not label you a traitor and his enemy. He does not have other of his armed minions arrest you, charge you with felonies, throw you into his jails or kill you if you resist. In addition to robbing you, the robber does not try to convince you of his good intentions, or try to make you into his slave. A robber is too honorable to perpetrate these heinous acts on individuals.

No, the armed robber cannot be compared in any way to the thieves and murderers known as the “government.”

Government robbers and murderers, unlike the armed robber, do not accept responsibility for their acts as individuals. They hide within the anonymity of the government. They choose certain of their minions, like those of the Internal Robbery Service (IRS) to commit the robberies on the government’s behalf. They bestow law enforcement authority and weapons on these toadies and give them their orders.

In essence and in practice they send forth “swarms of officers to harass the people and eat out their substance” (from the Declaration of Independence). They assert that the government needs the people’s money for its endeavors. If an individual resists, telling the government that he never contracted with the government for its protection or its endeavors, they will inform the individual that he will pay and be protected whether he likes it or not. If he further refuses to comply with their demands, the toadie thugs will at least seize enough of the citizen’s property to sell in settlement of the government’s demands. And that’s just this year’s take.

If the citizen still resists and defends his property, and in that effort, kills any minons, the citizen will either be captured or killed himself. If captured, he will be tried and imprisoned or put to death. Should the citizen enlist the efforts of others of like mind to resist the demands of the government, they will all be labeled “tax cheats, kooks, rebels, traitors,” or any other pejorative moniker that government can use to besmirch their names. But government would also enlist greater forces to put down this armed rebellion, even if hundreds of thousands of rebels took up arms against the government. But happily, one day the tax rebellion could reach a critical mass that was greater than the government’s ability to crush.

And all of this action and consequence flows from one person just wanting to be left alone and resisting aggression from others. The citizen commits no force or fraud upon others…he only seeks to live his life as he sees fit.

All government has the potential for tyranny. The way to minimize tyranny is to create governments with very limited powers and strictly police their actions.

That is one of the reasons I’ve written in past articles about creating a new nation in the model of a corporation, and using only sales tax as the sole method of taxation. The corporate model of government creates a legal written contract between the citizens for the operation of their country. And, as sales tax is the least oppressive and most voluntary form of taxation, it is the best solution to raise revenue to pay for the new nation’s functions.

Secession is the Hope For Mankind. Who will be first?

DumpDC. Six Letters That Can Change History.

© Copyright 2010, Russell D. Longcore. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

9 Responses to Armed Robbery or Government: Which is Better?

  1. Redman says:

    While what is stated can be true, it does not have to be. The fundamental problem is that most folks do not know what the law actually says or how it applies to earnings in the private sector. For most Americans, earnings from activities in the private sector are outside the taxing authority of the central govt. And please don’t say the 16th amendment changed all that. Were your grandparents really that stupid and ill-informed to just hand over control of their property to the central govt. No way!

    The details of the tax law, how it applies to activities in the private sector and the scope of the tax authority of the central govt. can be found at The truth about the tax is to be found in the evidence provided at the site.

    Don’t be secure in what you think you know to be true about the tax; examine the documents and details at the Lost Horizons site and then decide.

    “It ain’t what you don’t know that puts a hurtin’ on you; it’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”

  2. Re: Lost Horizons – Cracking The Code – Peter Hendrickson

    Always remember, slaves are never set free in the master’s court.

    An armed person can choose who is master over his or her Life, Liberty, and Property.

    An unarmed person cannot even choose which master shall own them, work them, and/or sell them.

    Are you a slave or are you the master over your own Sovereign physical form and Life, Liberty, and Property?

    There are only two types of human beings

    The one type just wants everyone to leave everyone else alone

    The other type refuses to do so while they still breathe

    You may pretend to be either but you will be shown to be only one

    Starving The Monkeys Continually And Forevermore,
    John and Dagny Galt
    Atlas Shrugged, Owners Manual For The Universe!(tm)


  3. David says:

    Your statement about paying your taxes then the government will leave you alone is false. Paying your tax is only one small part of the constant hassel of our government. Do you notice that the cops always seem to be checking speeds on the streets that feed into work? How about the horror of trying to actually board a plane to do business or a much needed vacation? All in the name of security which is not really security as any well intentioned terrorist can do whatever they desire. The list can go on and on. The government seems to be in everything.

  4. FSK says:

    All taxation is theft, even a sales tax.

    The correct answer is “Who needs a government at all?” All services currently provided by the government can be done better by multiple competing vendors in a really free market.

    There should be free market competition in everything, including selling police protection. If you think about it, it would work. It’s a huge difference from the way you’ve been brainwashed to think.

    • dumpdc says:

      No argument with you. However, I try to think from a pragmatic viewpoint. We’re going to get some form of government whether we like it or not. So, nodding to the inevitable, I try to recommend workable solutions. Anarchy is not workable for a population.

      • Just keep your government away from our anarchy and we’ll be just fine.

        Starving The Monkeys Continually And Forevermore,
        John and Dagny Galt
        Atlas Shrugged, Owners Manual For The Universe!(tm)


  5. Glenn Winstead says:

    This was a very nicely written article, reminding me of a similar essay by Lysander Spooner in 1867. A small government was tried, and could not be controlled. The monster always grows. FSK is correct: no government is the solution. Keep up the great fight.

  6. Chris says:

    Anarchy also isn’t an option for Christians, as Jesus taught us to pay our taxes: “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” Thankfully, He never commanded us to love Caesar.

  7. Redman says:

    If I extend to you the privilege of using my land for your lemonade stand, do I have a ‘right” to require tribute(taxes)from you for that privilege? My guess is yes as I have an ownership right to that privilege. So, does the central govt. have the same right when it comes to a privilege it extends, say, working for it? Again, yes and for the same reason. That is exactly what the federal income tax law says in essence. And since federal privilege does not extend to activities of common occupations in the private sector, it has no “right” to require/expect tribute from anyone engaged in those activities.
    Therefore, most Americans, working in the private sector have earnings that fall outside the taxing scope of the central govt.

    It’s not the law that’s the problem, it’s the lack of understanding and knowledge about the law. See for the complete story and the evidence that confirms the facts of that story. How hard can that be?
    BTW, a slave is anyone that waits for someone else to set him free.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: