Secession and the United Nations

In my last article, “Secession, The Second Amendment and Sun Tzu,” I ended by saying that American states that revitalized their militias “may secede knowing that they are capable of defending their decision from all who would attempt to use force to prevent their exit.”

But there may be more players in this drama who would wish to prevent the secession of an American state and ultimately the dissolution of the United States of America. Or, those very players might welcome the sight of the USA going the way of the USSR.

I have also written about the informal group “Oath Keepers,” ( Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reservists, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath they swore, with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with them, to “support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God.” Their Oath is to the Constitution.

To the degree that the Oath Keepers are successful spreading their message throughout the military and law enforcement communities, there will be less and less soldiers, cops and veterans willing to enforce Federal dictates. That will be a godsend for Liberty, but very bad juju for Washington. American military and law enforcement personnel may not be willing to fire upon American citizens who band together to secede, just wanting to be free of Washington’s tyrannical rule.

So, what could Washington do if it wanted to prevent or reverse a secession, and force a state to stay in the Union? How might they respond to a lack of obedience from their military or from law enforcement?

Holler for help from the United Nations.

Do you think that UN troops would have any such moral conflict? Would they be anything but mercenary troops on our soil? I contend that the blue berets would not hesitate to enforce some future UN resolution enacted in New York City against the secession of an American state.

Conversely, the one-world-government types might welcome the dissolution of the USA. They might think that getting Washington out of the way could grease the skids for a one-world government and a new world economic system.

I don’t think there are any blue hats patrolling in Switzerland. But I could be wrong. Think about it. Armed neutrality is the new old way.

The person who spends some time thinking about every possible scenario will make better plans and will have less chance of being surprised by any event.

For a related UN article, read L. Neil Smith’s article HERE.

DumpDC. Six Letters That Can Change History.

© Copyright 2009, Russell D. Longcore. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

5 Responses to Secession and the United Nations

  1. […] and the United Nations Posted on December 23, 2009 by Bill Miller This Article by Russell D. Longcore on So, what could Washington do if it wanted to prevent or reverse a secession, and force a state to […]

  2. Again Russ, A very insightful article. U.N. Troops enforcing a D.C. policy on American soil would stir a rebellion far greater than did the Hessian Mercenaries during the Revolution did, I fear. Could we survive it? is the question. If worse came to worse, I think so.
    “The Oath Keepers” are absolutely on the right track, with the upper echelons sounding the bugle loud and strong in a correct manner. It’s the extremely radical far right anarchistic lower ranks, that I have “bumped” into that gives me pause. This needs to be cleaned up fast for the movement to survive. Other than that, I am one of them.
    Sheriff Richard Mack is also on the right track. We are having him speak here on March 31st, 2010.
    Ryan Burgett, my second in command, and Chairman will keep a dialogue going with y’all. While the Mrs and I head south to my son’s home for Christmas, about 3 hours from here.
    So a Very Merry Christmas 2009 to all of you.
    God Bless!!

  3. Lumpyoatmeal says:

    Wow, this ties in directly with Executive Order 12425 which was just signed on the 17th giving INTERPOL immunity on American soil. I do not believe they do actual field police work, but who is to say they will not be given that authority in time. With this executive immunity, they have more rights on American soil than do our own law enforcement officers… and of course they are not bound by the same regulations and oaths. I would love to hear your opinion on this.

    • dumpdc says:

      My response in regard to this EO is that this is yet another reason why the states have only two choices: (1)continue as serfdoms, as nullification will not work, or (2) secede from the USA and throw off the tyranny of Washington DC. Think about the USSR in 1989.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: