Secession from Obama’s America

by Zach Jones

Is it a Field of Dreams or a Plea for Return to a Constitutional Republic?

Last night I stumbled upon an article, A Case For Secession-Introduction, (first of a series) on Gather.com (Editor’s Note: We ran this article here at DumpDC on November 19th) and it struck me that the time may soon be approaching when one or two states will be called to step up for the rest of us in hopes of saving the Republic. I’m not advocating for secession now; I’m just looking at the possibility with a little more interest. How such a move might shift our ‘government’ back to position where Representatives actually have to listen to and respect their constituents is a question that interests me. What is clear is that with Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid in control, Democratic Members of Congress are currently being effectively bribed with earmarks, promises or threats to pass legislation America does not want. They are not listening.

Polling demonstrates over and over the majority of Americans are against government run healthcare, are against unreasonable infringement of our Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms, are against illegal immigration, are against socialism, are against tax dollar funding of organizations like ACORN and SEIU, are against politicians creating unsustainable debt that will cripple their children’s futures, are against government manipulate of the news, are against government creating more unsustainable entitlements, are against Congress not adhering to the Constitution, are against Congress exceeding their power, are against Congress trampling on the rights reserved to the states under the Constitution, and are against unreasonable infringement of rights of privacy and free speech. In many states, the majorities are huge. They generally reflect states with populations that realize that government handouts do nothing other than create dependence to government/politicians and harm the recipients.

Today Congress is acting like a mule; and like a mule, sometimes the only way to get its attention is to hit it between the eyes. As we (a majority) all know, the Obama Congress is running America’s balance sheet, value of her dollar, and entire economy over the cliff. Most of us also know that it’s only drastic action can get the attention of this Congress that appears hell bent on ushering in a new socialist nation. Ordinary Americans are trying with massive Tea Parties, but one certain way to get Washington’s attention and possibly prevent the coming economic and social disaster (annihilation) is for one state or two to say ENOUGH! The preverbal two by four between the eyes may be what is called for to save the futures of all Americans.

Logistically there are only a few states that have strong enough economies and sufficient resources to tell the Federal Government to go screw itself, we are going our own way.

Alaska has sufficient resources (energy, etc.), access to trade with other countries (Canada and Russia), self-sufficient people, leaders who have a minimal concept of a balanced budget, and natural independence from the contiguous United States.

Texas has many of the same attributes as Alaska (a notion of being somehow independent of the rest of the country, trade with Mexico, Latin America and an independent/self-sufficient people).

N. Dakota, Nebraska a few other boarder/coastal states may be able to manage independence for themselves, but not without a lot of determination. Other central states like Oklahoma would probably need prearranged trade compacts with neighboring states to be successful. They would go along as they have been; except they would not pay federal taxes, nor receive federal tax dollars nor serve in the U. S. military. That would certainly get people’s attention.

Most of the states that might reasonably consider secession as an option are the ones that ARE NOT like California, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, or New Jersey, etc. where politicians have intentionally created large dependent populations of people and groups with their hands out for “other peoples’ money” (dependent voting blocks tied to money- not principle).

To have a shot at successfully seceding, it is likely that a state must first have a large majority of its population that is interested in independence, who are self-reliant, who as a group have not been used to taking more than their fair share of federal tax dollars, who are not looking for ways to avoid fair taxes but who don’t want to be carrying the load for the above named states, who have reasonable expectations of government; and most importantly, who care about freedom, equality and the principles of the United States Constitution more than the “Federal Government”. America is its people; it is not the buildings, institutions, and politicians in Washington, D. C.

If a state did have the courage to choose secession, many of their residents would likely flee. However, millions of independent/self-sufficient Americans, small businesses, and numerous large businesses would be just as quick to try to come to live and thrive in freedom. Like the movie ‘Field of Dreams’ – build it and they will come. I believe that is true. Especially, if the state is built/rebuilt upon the principles that founded the once great U.S.A., it would ensure a diverse, hardy, can do citizenry that encourages one another. You know, a citizenry like America once had. Not the one that sues every time their coffee is too hot or they have their feeling hurt slightly.

Such a state’s own tax dollars, collected in a fair and reasonable manner from its citizens, would go twice as far as those they had been paying the federal government. Tax systems could be simplified so everyone has a stake in the services provided by government because they too are paying taxes. Those in times of need would be given a helping hand up to reach their potential instead of under the government’s foot!

If fact, upon secession, such a state could made one big but simple change in the system that would go far to encourage individuals to strive for success. What if the state recognized that it would be more likely that voters would choose the best candidate to represent all the people if voters did not have a big conflict of interest present? What if the state said that if you are currently receiving monetary benefits from the state/tax-payers (worker’s compensation, welfare, etc., excluding total disability) you cannot vote in any state election until you stop receiving government assistance? If one wants to participate in elections, one would need to try to get better if injured, try earnestly to find work, or find a way to stop receiving benefits from the state.

Education, environmental protection, etc. could all happen because it would not be in people’s self-interest to scam the state. Spending for the public good would likely be a lot more reasonable and not tied to corrupt special interest groups like ACORN.

If one or two states did choose to succeed from the Union, it would not necessarily have to be on a permanent basis. It might be done with the understanding that when the federal government starts respecting the rights of the individual and the states, balances its budget or at least seriously starts down that path, respects and again follows the Constitution; and stops supporting enterprises with a history of intimidation/voter fraud like SEIU and ACORN; then they would consider rejoining the union.

Somehow I imagine every Senator and Representative saying to himself or herself –

What have we done? We have brought about the destruction of America. It was on my watch!

(One additional thing for Members of Congress to remember is that states like California, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and some other bloated, selfish, leftist states have much lower percentages of residents enlisting in the military than states that would be more likely to entertain seceding! Who would protect America and her diminishing freedoms from al Qaeda and the Taliban? Maybe they could make a deal with the state/nation to allow its free citizens to serve in the U. S. military.)

Maybe Members of Congress wouldn’t say anything and just continue bleeding America’s taxpayers without listening to them.

I hope for the former; but if the latter occurred, I would pack my bags and move to Texas or wherever. I would be going to that ‘Field of Dreams’!

Never in my 55 years on this earth have I thought that I would seriously consider the idea of secession from the United States of America. I guess I was wrong. Personally, I will be waiting to see if America can be set again on its path under the Constitution through the electoral process in 2010.

If America can’t be righted to its course, it may be prudent for all freedom loving Americans to be reading up on secession.

Speaking of the 2010 elections, have you heard that Larry Sinclair, the man who alleges that he and Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual sex in 1999, is running for Congress?

Copyright © 2009 About Australia

4 Responses to Secession from Obama’s America

  1. Burke101 says:

    If a state did have the courage to choose secession, many of their residents would likely flee.

    In recent years the people of various states have voted for, and passed, medical marijuana laws. What has been the federal government’s response? Did DC recognize the Tenth Amendment rights of states here? Or did it send in the secret (DEA) police to shut down the cannabis clinics. How have state governments responded? Have the states called out their National Guards to stop the feds at the border? Of course not–if anything, many state and local law enforcement agencies have cooperated with the federal secret police.

    If the federal government is going to put the “boot” in on alternative healthcare providers because they do not bow down before DC, how much more will the federal government crack down on a state which openly secedes? Does anyone here believe that DC would simply allow a state to secede peacefully? Or would the feds instead send in the SWAT teams, the extrajudicial renditioners, the rest of paramilitary apparatus?

    Look at the fate of the Branch Davidians over at Waco, Texas. Did Texas, for all of its blatherings about being the “Lone Star State” send in its militia to fight the BATF-FBI? Nope. Texas rolled over, the same way every other state would roll over if the talk of secession turned to anything more than talk.

    I would really like for someone to provide me with a realistic scenario for secession.

    • dumpdc says:

      Under the present power structure, there is no realistic scenario for secession. Should there be? Certainly. But the only realistic scenario is secession AFTER economic collapse. When DC has money problems, it will be hamstrung in a response to a secession.

  2. Robert Taylor says:

    Secession should be used initially as “leverage”…it will definitely get the attention of the rest of the country if, say if in Texas for example, a petition signed by millions of Texas was delivered to the governor requesting that Texas legally and peaceably secede. Leverage is, in essence, a pivot that turn the tide and encourage other states to follow suit. That is realistic and doable. We cannot sit idly by and do NOTHING!!! We are losing are liberties daily.
    Robert Taylor/Hondo, TX/rtaylortitle@aol.com

  3. Dubl says:

    Nevada is the best state to secede. First of all it is home to many secret military installations. A public secession by Nevada would put Federal government in the precarious position of having to either enter heavy negotiations to secure access and right to their installations there, or take covert actions of aggression against the state (which would be a losing proposition as the terrain is like Afghanistan and many Nevadans are well armed). Both options would put the government is a major backpedal.

    I was in Vegas last week, and despite the state of the economy, it was standing room only. Without any federal tax obligations, and with its legal gambling, legal prostitution, and perhaps legalized marijuana, Nevada could pave its streets with gold as an independent state. Furthermore there is so much undeveloped land, or land ‘appropriated’ by the government and military, they could easily open vast areas to settlement via old fashioned claim-staking. They have oil, natural gas, gold, minerals, half the Hoover Dam, and URANIUM!!! A sovreign Nevada would be EVERYTHING the Federal Government is scared of. This is why a dolt like Harry Reid is given the power he has. Anyone thinking of starting a grassroots secession movement would be wise to start there…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: